I do write write loads and loads of messages in a lot of discussion fora. There's an inherent, unifying theme in nearly all my writings, nevertheless. I never highlight a fault with the system when the individuals that should run the system are faulty themselves. Unless the operators know how to run a machine, one should not try to repair the machine - it's bound to break down again, even if one repairs it successfully! We, the people, are the operators in a democracy, of course!
We, as individuals:
lack a lot of knowledge, information, and attributes,
do a lot of mistakes, individually and as a part of various groups,
follow a lot of unethical practices,
find fault with everyone and everything except what we feel our own,
find a reason to blame or rant and move on with a pseudo-satisfaction of achievement,
are filled with skepticism and hatred towards the System that we don’t understand,
ignore that we need to understand the System before we can even deem it dysfunctional,
think we can troubleshoot the System we do not know,
extrapolate and blow up our limited understanding of a part of our surroundings – only that we want to see – and think the whole Society is the same,
do not realize that We, the people, are the only ones to be ever blamed in a democracy; after all, we are the rulers!
forget that other individuals in the System can be wrong and then blow up that “individuals” to a “group” and that group to “Society” and that “Society” to the “System”.
Thus said, I have a trouble convincing people that individual-level reforms should come first. I really wish people do find a sound argument to explain why the System should be reformed first. And/or I wish that they would agree that finding individual-level solutions is more important, necessary, and effective compared to system-level solutions that no one wants to design, test-drive, implement, manage, troubleshoot, or even believe in!