Showing posts with label practicality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label practicality. Show all posts

Saturday, March 26, 2011

A new social activity/service organization?

Having been in the USA for most part of the last 11 years or more, I have been a virtual member of several social activity/service groups/organizations. While I do subscribe to parts of all ideologies of all these groups, I do not intend to form my own organization possibly ever! Why? To put it short, decentralized efforts cannot achieve anything but temporary and short-lived satisfaction and scope.

 

Why do you want to "establish [your] NGO" rather than joining an existing organization? That’s the big question I always have in mind whenever an enthusiastic individual says that (s)he wants to start an organization. In my opinion, it's better to join an existing organization for various reasons:

An established organization has already established its reach in the domain it's interested in.

An established organization has a dedicated/devout volunteer base that has passed through the phases of taking pains and choosing priorities very well, probably the hard way. This means, the "aarambha-Sooratwam" (initial fervor) has already ended and they have already "worked through" the intricacies of the domain of interest.

An established organization would have already devised a channel for donations from people in various cities and even countries. The IT Department paperwork is not something one can simply do, and clearance for foreign exchange donations takes two (or three?) years after applying for it, and you cannot apply for it until you the IT clearance for domestic donations (which takes a year or more, if I remember correctly). In other words, an organization cannot solicit donations from people outside the members' personal reach for up to 3-5 years after registration. Money isn't everything but money does make many things, of course.

Decentralized efforts cannot bring very major change, like I wrote earlier. For example, Hyderabad alone had 58 organizations working in the "traffic improvement" domain as of 2003 (when I last enquired from a sub-registrar Office)! How much has the traffic improved really? Imagine if coordinated efforts are taken up by one organization that can amalgamate all these passionate volunteers working all over the place with whatever meager money they can amass together and working in conjunction with the traffic police department. Can you not imagine a better traffic situation then?

 

Thus said, I recommend that everyone that has a passion to work towards a better society should join at least one existing organization to see how things work and notice how one would "continue to feel" about the goals, and means, while working towards the same.

For example, I am personally more interested in the society at large, and my motto is "educate the literates" - that's what I am interested in personally. But, I involve myself in every organization that I can come across, so that I can understand my "target" – the Society - better. Some organizations may, on the surface, seem myopic in their goals and reach, but then they're probably doing so very much better in that niche domain; even bigger organizations may probably not be able to cater so much to such remote areas of work/need. Some may want to address individuals and only individuals' personal needs. That's not exactly my "target" audience but I still want to learn how things work at their level, so that I can understand and learn if those, or similar, solutions can be implemented to the society at large.

 

…So, do I have any recommendations? Well, yes, if you really want some point of start. You are free to choose any of those below or many more out there:

 

To Make A Difference (TMAD) <http://www.tmad.org/> works towards needs in the domains of education, health, support to individuals and communities, Right To Information (RTI), and so on. You may want to join the Yahoo! Group if you are interested: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tomakeadifference/>. TMAD (I call it “Team-Add” instead of “T-MAD”) started as a group of individuals and runs on regular membership contributions and need-specific donations from donors, members and non-members. TMAD was also instrumental in forming a "syndicate" of likeminded groups titled "Birds of Same Feathers (BOSF)" and is working at larger objectives through this initiative. The best thing about this group is that most people are just individuals that take time and money out for this organization, and the group works on 0% organizational costs, i.e. the donations are used 100% to address the needs; all costs borne by members comes from their own individual pockets.

BhUMi <http://www.bhumi.in/> reaches the lower strata and society at large. Branch-off of Bharat Uday Mission (BM) in Hyderabad, as basic aim shifted from politics to social service.

Karmayog <http://www.karmayog.org/> is headquartered in Mumbai and is essentially aimed towards society at large, enlisting local efforts in various cities, and throwing light on various societal issues.
Youth for Social Change (YSC) is based in Chennai, and is working towards a better society in general through various awareness initiatives; most of the members are part of various other likeminded groups and share responsibilities and information. You may want to join the Google Group if you are interested: <http://groups.google.com/group/youthforsocialchange>

 

More, bigger (national-level) organizations:

India Literacy Project (ILP): <http://www.ILPnet.org/>
Association for India's Development (AID): <
http://www.AidIndia.org/>
ASHA for Education: <
http://www.ASHAnet.org/>
Foundation for Democratic Reforms of India (FDRI): <
http://www.FDRI.org/>
Lok Satta Organization: <
http://www.LokSatta.org/>
Mission Safer India (founded by Kiran Bedi): <
http://www.SaferIndia.com/>
No Ragging Foundation: <
http://NoRaggingFoundation.blogspot.com/>

5th Pillar: <http://www.5thPillar.org/>

Vote India: <http://www.VoteIndia.in/>

 

There are much bigger (international) organizations such as Red Cross, GreenPeace, Amnesty International, Child Relief and You (CRY), Children International, UNICEF, and so on that you can be a part of.

 

N.B.: In no way do I claim that the above list is exhaustive. There are hundreds and thousands of such organizations in India and abroad, thanks to which we are what we are today. Kudos to all the volunteers in all such organizations!

 

Lastly, I say this: I am an engineer, and therefore, if I don't know how to approach a scientific problem, what I'd rather do is see how others do it, and then if I can't still devise my own way of working out a solution, my best approach would be use a statistical approximation - perform an integral/summation over all possible solutions and therein is a plausible solution! That's what I do for real world problems too.

Friday, March 25, 2011

Is it the System or is it us?

I do write write loads and loads of messages in a lot of discussion fora. There's an inherent, unifying theme in nearly all my writings, nevertheless. I never highlight a fault with the system when the individuals that should run the system are faulty themselves. Unless the operators know how to run a machine, one should not try to repair the machine - it's bound to break down again, even if one repairs it successfully! We, the people, are the operators in a democracy, of course!

We, as individuals:

lack a lot of knowledge, information, and attributes,

do a lot of mistakes, individually and as a part of various groups,

follow a lot of unethical practices,

find fault with everyone and everything except what we feel our own,

find a reason to blame or rant and move on with a pseudo-satisfaction of achievement,

are filled with skepticism and hatred towards the System that we don’t understand,

ignore that we need to understand the System before we can even deem it dysfunctional,

think we can troubleshoot the System we do not know,

extrapolate and blow up our limited understanding of a part of our surroundings – only that we want to see – and think the whole Society is the same,

do not realize that We, the people, are the only ones to be ever blamed in a democracy; after all, we are the rulers!

forget that other individuals in the System can be wrong and then blow up that “individuals” to a “group” and that group to “Society” and that “Society” to the “System”.

 

Thus said, I have a trouble convincing people that individual-level reforms should come first. I really wish people do find a sound argument to explain why the System should be reformed first. And/or I wish that they would agree that finding individual-level solutions is more important, necessary, and effective compared to system-level solutions that no one wants to design, test-drive, implement, manage, troubleshoot, or even believe in!

Friday, June 20, 2008

Traffic Management - Hyderabad Police seek Public Interaction

The Additional Commission of Police (Traffic), K. Kaumudi, announced that the Traffic Police Deparment intends to conduct open house discussions on Traffic Management in the city on June 22, Sunday. The following are the time and venue in various zones:

Traffic Division #1: Mahankali Market, Gopalapuram, Chilakalaguda, Lalaguda, Tukaram Gate, Marredpally, Karkhana, Bowenpally, Trimulgherry, Bollaram police station jurisdrictions
Time: 11:00 a.m.
Venue: St. Patrick's School, Secunderabad (Near Manohar Talkies)
Concerned ACP: Jaya Rao (94906-16007)

Traffic Division #2: Panjagutta, S.R. Nagar, Banjara Hills, Jubilee Hills, Begampet, Ramgopalpet police station jurisdrictions
Time: 9 a.m.
Venue: Jaya Garden Function Hall, Somajiguda
Concerned ACP: T. Ram Sudhakar (94906-16022)

Traffic Division #3: Abids, Saifabad, Chikkadpally, Narayanaguda, Musheerabad, Gandhi Nagar police station jurisdrictions
Time: 9 a.m.
Venue: Ruby Garden Function Hall, King Kothi
Concerned ACP: A.K. Dubey (94906-16041)

Traffic Division #4: Begum Bazar, Nampally, Habeeb Nagar, Mangalhat, Shah-inayat Gunj, Kulsumpura, Tappachabutra, Asif Nagar, Langar House, Golconda, Humayun Nagar police station jurisdrictions
Time: 10 a.m.
Venue: Sabha Function Hall, Nampally (Right beside Nampally Police Station)
Concerned ACP: B.R. Baig (94906-16056)

Traffic Division #5: Old City, Sultan Bazar, Afzal Gunj, Amberpet, Kacheguda, Osmania University, Nallakunta, Malakpet, Chaderghat, Saidabad police station jurisdrictions
Time: 10:30 a.m.
Venue: S.S. Gardens, Nalgonda X Roads
Concerned ACP: T. Ramesh (94906-16083)

Agenda: (Estimated time of discussions: ~2 hours)
* Traffic jams - frequently occuring areas and solutions
* Parking - issues and solutions
* Suggestions for new one way routes in residential colonies
* Invitations to Volunteers and Traffic Wardens from among citizens
* Any other issues pertaining to Traffic

Attendees:
Representatives from
* Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC)
* Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) & SETWIN
* Cantonment Board Members (in Secunderabad Zone only)

Please circulate this information to all individuals and organizations you know.

(Courtesy: Eenadu, Hyderabad Edition, June 20, 2008)

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Practical Idealism versus Ideal Practice

I always hear: idealism and practicality are opposites! Well, I surely don't ever see it as a black-or-white question. Why, you may ask? Simply because they're but just two adjectives that can take other nouns, including each other! That's exactly why this piece is titled as it is.

What's it to be practical? To put something in practice. And, now, what renders idealism an unsuitable candidate? Nothing but unnecessary apprehensions that ...well, idealism cannot be put in practice! I simply ask, to inform myself, as to why idealism cannot be put in practice, and I still am yet to find a person who can give me a logical, straightforward answer. Now, what's it to be ideal? To follow certain ideals, of course! What ideals, due course of action decides.

Some ideals of old times might seem "impractical" as is, and what do you do then? Make them practical, of course, or how can you put them into practice! That's what I term Practical Idealism. In cases where there're no prescribed ideals, the practice, in a win-win situation, could be called Ideal Practice, by bringing practicality as close as possible to an “assumed ideal”. There is a subtle difference between the two, I dare to point, in that Ideal Practice is to be only sought after as the modus operandi when Practical Idealism is, presumably, not all feasible. (By "not all feasible", I refer to circumstantial constraints on its applicability but not on its practicability.) In other words, when ideal comes to meet practice, it's Practical Idealism, and when practice comes to meet the ideal, it's Ideal Practice.

How does this wordplay matter? Well, the wordplay doesn't matter, surely, but what matters is people's perception of both idealism and practicality. When one talks about practicality, one treats it as an antonym of idealism, like I wrote when I started. So, how does this antonymy matter? By looking at these terms as antonyms, practicality is put afar off idealism and not as nearer as it could be! In this light, idealism is cast off outright. If only one tries to bring practicality as much nearer to idealism as possible, one attains Ideal Practice, and in most cases, a bit of furthering shall bring oneself to Practical Idealism.

The bottom line? Practice Idealism, and you'd then learn that it's practicable. Look at them as opposites, and your practicality is never ideal!

JAIJust An Indian”